C.Syde's Wiki
31 Posts
AJforLIFE13
Mario&LuigiBowser'sInsideStory
JustLeafy
C.Syde65
ChocolateLexiRocks1

Filter Posts Reset

Categories

Sort By

  • All
  • Following
• 8/22/2018

My Tribal Tattoo Art: Unicorn

This Took me 1 afternoon!
Post image
2 5
• 8/22/2018

Who wants to see my art work?!?!?!?!

Tribal tattoo art
Wolves, music, angels, etc.
1 0
• 6/9/2018

@everyone

Okay I'm sorry! I just had to do it.
2 11
This post is locked.
• 5/21/2018
2 1
This post is locked.
• 4/13/2018

Changing the requirements for user-rights candidates

Since we've had a lot of successful nominations of various users on this wiki, I thought that I should make a proposal regarding whether or not the current requirements for chat moderator, rollback, and discussion moderator candidates should be increased slightly.

Currently if a user applies for chat moderator, rollback, or discussion moderator rights, they will always have their requests accepted as long as the administrator or bureaucrat accepting the request is unable to find any history of negative edits from the user on any wikis.

But that tactic hasn't always proven to be the greatest, especially given that a few of our users that had their requests approved were discovered to have a questionable history on other wikis, after their requests were accepted.

Three of these users were globally blocked at some point after their requests were approved for different reasons, so there was no other option but to demote those users.

Since local administrators cannot lookup a user's contributions on multiple wikis by means of the https://community.wikia.com/wiki/Special%3ALookupContribs special page, their methods of trying to verify whether a user has made any negative contributions on so much as a single wiki are quite limited.

So my proposal is that the current requirements for chat moderator, rollback, and discussion moderator candidates be changed so that a user can only have their request approved if the administrator or bureaucrat is able to confirm whether the user has a clean record of no negative edits on wikis. Candidates for content moderator, assistant, and administrator rights will also be bound to this change.

It is currently 5:11 PM in New Zealand. This thread will be open for five days. Once the timer expires, if there is no clear consensus one way or another, the request may stay open for an additional two days. If there still isn't a clear consensus, well we'll see what should happen after that.
5 12
• 4/6/2018

Random post

PARTY EVERYBODY!!!!
Post image
2 5
• 3/15/2018

Poll:Wiki-Style Polls vs. Discussions Polls

Do you prefer Wiki-Style Polls or Discussions Polls?
Do you prefer Wiki-Style Polls or Discussions Polls?
  • Wiki-Style Polls
  • Discussions Polls
0 9 8
• 3/14/2018

Polls are now enabled on C.Syde's Wiki!

Looks like polls have been enabled on this wiki now, after I sent a request to have them enabled.

While it is a beta feature, I requested to have them enabled early, which makes C.Syde's Wiki one of the first communities to have polls added, as well as the second community that I'm part of that has gotten them so far.

By the looks of things, it appears that only the original post can have polls added to them, other posts can only have images added to them. But enjoy! :D
What is your reaction to polls being enabled on this wiki?
  • OMG, awesome!
  • Great
  • Meh, they're alright
  • Not that great
  • OMG, terrible!
1 21 9
• 2/7/2018
5 14
• 12/30/2017

Count to 25 before an Administrator, Assistant, or Content Moderator posts

This game is practically the same as Count to 10 before an Administrator, Assistant, Content Moderator posts. The idea is for users to count to 25 before an Administrator, Assistant, or Content Moderator posts, otherwise the number will be reset. I figured counting to 25 would a lot more challenging than counting to 10. Do not make more than one post at a time, because that will be cheating.
2 685
• 11/8/2017

Count to 25 before a non-Administrator, non-Assistant, or non-Content Moderator posts

This game is practically the same as Count to 10 before a non-Admin, non-Assistant, non-Content Mod posts. The idea is for Administrators, Assistants, and Content Moderators to count to 25 before a user posts who is not an Administrator, Assistant, or Content Moderator, otherwise the number will be reset. I figured counting to 25 would a lot more challenging than counting to 10. Do not make more than one post at a time, because that will be cheating.

Also if a user that isn't an Administrator, Assistant, or Content Moderator has posted, and an Administrator, Assistant, or Content Moderator has not yet posted underneath, if you aren't an Administrator, Assistant, or Content Moderator, please don't post until an Administrator, Assistant, or Content Moderator does. There shouldn't be more than one post from a non-Admin, non-Assistant, non-Content Mod at a time.
0 470
• 10/30/2017

Damn the person above you game

When each person replies, it will be damning the one above them such as: "Damned <Insert person here>". And the the next person will reply: "Damned <Insert person here>".

RULES:
No swearing.

No spamming.

No potty mouthing.

No personal attacks.
1 1074
• 10/27/2017

Would you rather?

The title of the thread is pretty self-explanatory. The idea is to ask the next user that posts what they would prefer to do out of 2 things.

The questions must be appropriate, and must not contain any bodily functions. Also no personal attacks, spamming, or derailment of this thread.
2 467
• 10/6/2017

Count to 10 before a non-Administrator, non-Assistant, or non-Content Moderator posts

The objective of the game is self-explanatory. The idea is for Administrators, Assistants, and Content Moderators to count to 10. But if a user posts who is not an Administrator, Assistant, or Content Moderator, the number will be reset. Do not make more than one post at a time, because that will be cheating.

Also if a user that isn't an Administrator, Assistant, or Content Moderator has posted, and an Administrator, Assistant, or Content Moderator has not yet posted underneath, if you aren't an Administrator, Assistant, or Content Moderator, please don't post until an Administrator, Assistant, or Content Moderator does. There shouldn't be more than one post from a non-Admin, non-Assistant, non-Content Mod at a time.
1 683
• 10/6/2017

Count to 10 before an Administrator, Assistant, or Content Moderator posts

The objective of the game is self-explanatory. The idea is for users to count to 10. But if an Administrator, Assistant, or Content Moderator posts, the number will be reset. Do not make more than one post at a time, because that will be cheating.
2 713
• 9/30/2017

Free-Chat

In this minigame, it's simple. Talk about anything you like no matter what. However, you are of course limited to spamming and swearing.

Alright, start!
2 185
• 9/30/2017

Chat War

In this minigame, you have to kill the person above you with anything you like.

e.g. Me: START!

Member A: Backstabs JustLeafy with a bowie.
Member B: Throws an egg bomb at Member A, and he blew up.
Member C: Sends Member B to the wall of shame, where he gets sacrificed for life.

And so on...

Alright, start!
2 186
• 9/28/2017

The person below you game

This game is straightforward. Try to guess something (or just make something up) about the person who will post after you. Then, that person will either answer that the fact is true or false (or absolutely crazy), then try to guess something about the next person.
2 772
This post is locked.
• 9/9/2017

SydeBud is adorable

YES HE IS! DEAL WITH IT WORLD OWO)/
0 5
This post is locked.
• 7/21/2017

Hey Everyone

What's up?
4 7